Every
morning I run a three-mile loop on the Devonian Pathway which surrounds the urban
side of Wascana Lake. Every morning I
say, “Morning” to everyone I meet on
these runs. This blog entry is simply a
conjecture on what these morning recipients are thinking, my inductive approach to
measuring the responses, and then bracketing these responses into four different personality traits. Of course I could
be wrong about everyone in this morning regard.
I could have
followed the Greek physician, Hippocrates
“father of medicine” (400 BC) theory that we are either sanguine (pleasure seeking and sociable), or choleric (ambitious and leader-like), or melancholic (analytical and literal), or phlegmatic (relaxed and thoughtful).
I could have
followed the early 1900’s personality theory of American writer, Katherine Cook
Briggs, and her daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers, the Myers-Briggs Personality Test insisting on the four categories of
people being: introversion/extroversion,
or sensing/intuition, or thinking/feeling, or judging/perceiving.
I could have
followed the personality theory of Swedish writer, Thomas Erikson, suggesting that people belong to the Reds (dominant and commanding), or the Yellows (social and optimistic), or the Greens (laid back and friendly), or the Blues (analytical and precise).
Instead of
following any of the above I chose to create my own psychology test, The
Morning Pneuma: The Pedestrian Personality Profile, which is based upon
my morning runs. “Morning”
is a wordplay. I do run every morning and while running I say “morning” to everyone I meet on the path.
Pneuma, which in Latin means air in motion or simply, breath, is a word I’ve chosen, too, for
the title because it is alliterative (the P
is silent), and because of the connotation of air in motion for a runner and the short greeting by anyone
responding requires just a breath to
deliver. (And it so happens that Pneuma, too, refers to spirit, mind, soul, self, and subconscious, also anima,
psyche, and personality. It’s the
perfect word!)
Like any
other psychology test, the Morning Pneuma
only measures one moment of behaviour in a person’s life. The Morning
Pneuma is simply one snapshot of one personality caught in a mere moment in
life. It would be wrong to suggest that
this moment represents this person’s whole personality. It would be wrong to inductively reason that
from one isolated moment of behaviour reflects one’s entire persona. Saying this, however, if someone’s behaviour
is consistently cheery or grumpy or fastidious or flaky in test after test,
whatever test being administered to measure this personality would for certain have
some validity and/or credibility.
Instructions
for the standardized administration of the MORNING
PNEUMA: THE PEDESTRIAN PERSONALITY PROFILE are simple, simple.
Because I’m
a regular morning runner, I tend to
meet the same people on every run. You
know what I mean? At the gym every day I
meet the same people who go to my gym at that same hour. As I pass a couple of bus stops on my walk to
my workplace every day I meet the same people standing at those bus stops. In the world of psychology, such people who
are predicatively present in places you frequently visit at the same particular
hours, those people who share the same space and times as yourself, are
referred to as familiar strangers.
On the
morning of the fourth of July, a usually busy, busy holiday but because of the
Covid restrictions in my city, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, I said, “morning,” to just 31 people walking down
the path. (I could’ve greeted people
other than walkers but I didn’t.) The
length of my run was three miles; the entire testing time took 33 minutes. This is my typical running speed – 11 minutes
per mile.)
For my test
I ran. To deliver my “mornings” I could’ve walked or I
could’ve ridden my bike, with likely the same test results.
Also, to
conduct my test, I could’ve picked anywhere, could've picked most
any day, could've picked most any time of day, or most anytime in any season. There are some
obvious exceptions: Anytime after dark
would be ridiculous. During heat waves
or frigid temperatures would be ridiculous.
In a mall or down the midway would be ridiculous. Anywhere in the boonies too far from the madding
crowd would have been ridiculous.
Essentially,
I have bracketed these “morning”
recipients into four pseudo-psychological personality types: Cheerios
(the rather sunny group), Grumpos (the surly group), Perfunctos
(the austere group), and Astros (the somewhat abstracted group). For the purposes of my points today, four
such personality types shall suffice.
Those sunny Cheerios are sweet
and cheerful; those surly Grumpos are
menacing and even threatening; those austere
Perfunctos are serious and stern; those abstracted
Astros are out of touch and lost in La-La land.
Of the
thirty-one morning recipients, I discerned thirteen
Cheerios, four Grumpos, eleven Perfunctos, and three Astros. Thirteen cheers for the Cheerios --
HIP HIP HOORAY! HIP HIP HOORAY! HIP HIP HOORAY ...
And here are
four of the familiar strangers that fit the bill of those personality groups I
am presenting. I shall refer to them by
nickname to protect their true identity, though I must confess I’ve no clue of
their true identities anyway.
Saint Nick is an older man who looks exactly
like the 50’s and 60’s Coca-Cola
Santa Claus. He is balding and sporting
a long white beard. He even dresses in
red most of the time. I have seen him in
a red t-shirt and I have noticed he wears red socks in his sandals. Saint Nick always says “hi there” or “hello” to
me before I morning him. Definitely a Cheerio, Saint Nick always smiles while he greets me.
Mister Tattoo is thirty-something, with shoulder-length
hair and shirtless, seemingly showing off his tattooed skinny arms, tattooed
moobs, and even his tattooed pot belly. Mister Tattoo glares at me whenever we
pass one another. To my morning greeting, Grumpo, Mister Tattoo, never nods or orally responds; instead, he
just sneers.
Red is always walking her two dogs. To my “mornings”
she simply nods her head with an expressionless visage. I have noticed one thing, especially, about
her. She is always rifling through the
dumpsters on the pathway, not looking for cans or bottles, but for food for her
dogs. I have seen her grab a box from the
garbage, empty the contents into her hand, then toss the food contents to the ground
for her mutts. Red is of the Perfunctos ilk.
Twist and Shout is always shakin’ it up and workin’ it
on out as he meanders down the path. Twist and Shout seems in no shape to
recognize, never mind acknowledge, my morning greeting. Always wearing a set of headphones, Twist and
Shout belongs to my Astros.
Basing my
MORNING PNEUMA results upon the responses from my cache of familiar strangers, here
is my skinny comparison to the other aforementioned published psychological personality
types:
My Cheerios would align with Erikson’s Yellows and Hippocrates’ Sanguines. My Grumpos
would align with Erikson’s Reds and
Hippocrates’ Cholerics. The Perfunctos
could be compared to Erikson’s Blues
and Hippocrates’ Melancholics. Those I’ve bracketed as Astros can be compared to Erikson’s Greens and Hippocrates’ Phlegmatics.
None of my
groups can easily be compared to those in the Myers-Briggs. Neither can Erikson’s nor Hippocrates’
personality types be easily compared to any in the Myers-Briggs. This is my educated guess.
Another educated guess is that my MORNING PNEUMA can be closely replicated while I'm thrumming at my next buskspot. Within the next day or two whilst on a busk with my banjo, I shall greet the first 31 passers-by with a "Morning" and keep a record of their responses.
Hmmm ...
STRUMMING SO, MY BUSKING WILL SOON BE TRANSFORMED FROM RECREATIONAL TO A MENSURABLE AVANT-GARDE ADVENTURE IN ACADEMIA!
Psychological
tests/inventories measure only person/s in a particular moment. Any behaviour before or after the testing
moments are very independent of the testing moment. Should the same test be replicated frequently
with the same results, the more reliable and the more valid do the test results
become.
Some
theorists have suggested that one’s true personality is only expressed under
emergency situations or expressed when a person knows that no one else is
around to observe one’s personal behaviour.
Such an emergency situation could include a heart attack or stroke, or a
natural disaster such as a flood or tornado.
Such behaviours occurring when no one else is around could include
picking one’s nose or being a litter bug.
I shall add
a point of personal reflection: The Cheerios could have been high on
drugs. The Grumpos might have been having just a bad day. The Astros
might have been rehearsing for a play or stage presentation somewhere. The Perfunctos
might have just been absorbed in thoughts elsewhere, yet still knowingly be sociable
enough to treat me with a morning
respect.
While
administering any academic psychological test that is credible, one has to
adhere to a code of ethics. However,
with regard to ethics while
conducting my Morning Pneuma, having people unwittingly be subjected a rather
non-intrusive morning greeting to determine some patterns of human behaviour,
then attaching such behaviours to certain personality types, I believe, is
okey- dokey. No person is
identified. No person is personality
criticized or humiliated. Every
unknowing participant is just another ghost in the morning pneuma machinery.
Speaking of
which, are we not all just ghosts in any stranger’s life. Of course I am not referring to haunting
ghosts – I am referring only to friendly ghosts.
IN THE WORLD
OF GHOSTS WE ARE MOSTLY CASPERS.
Not-so-strangely,
here are some movie ghosts making a shadowy appearance in my CHAUCERIAN PARADE today:
POLLYANNA -
CHEERIO - POLLYANNA MOVIE
MEAN GIRL -
GRUMPO - MEAN GIRLS MOVIE
MR. SPOCK -
PERFUNCTO - STAR TREK MOVIE
JEFF SPICOLI
- ASTRO - FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH MOVIE