Obviously my
snappy title for this blog is in reference to the hell-hound in the Sherlock Holmes tale of terror mystery (The Hound of the
Baskervilles, 1902) set in Dartmoor, England.
My tale is
not so terrible. My tale is set in
present day Regina, Canada. My tale is
one of frustration, a tale of attempting to solve the mystery of how-to-draw
Zoey, which I did solve, but after three tries.
Here is
Zoey:
And here is
attempt number one:
Though the
actual artwork is appealing, I quite disliked this picture because it did not
look like Zoey. I,
the critic, saw the face as being too narrow, the snout too small, and the eyes
too big.
And here is
attempt number two:
This
depiction of Zoey was closer but not quite what I was attempting to do. To me, it still did not look like Zoey. The snout was still a tad
small and the eyes a tad too big. The
width of the face I got!
And here is
attempt number three:
Finally! A Zoey drawing that I like! I’ve never met Zoey but still I recognize
that at last I DREW the Zoey that I SEE in the picture sent to me on my IPhone.
Zoey was a
mystery, and Zoey proved to be a mystery that I solved.
And, dear
reader, why would I write such a drawing tale?
Is this story of Zoey really just another of my Aesopian tales to be
pondered?
Could this story really be about searching for a life that I can love, a life of meaning and
adventure, fulfilled by drawing people and pet portraits down on the sidewalks in the
local farmers markets?
Or could
this story of drawing Zoey be a last middle-aged attempt to create an
amaranthine existence, imagining that my I-am-old-and-afraid-to-die
signature on the bottom right of every portrait that I sketch shall be forever hanging in a frame on a wall within a house somewhere in the world?
Could it be
that this tale of Zoe (pun intended) is simply an appeal to my
complicated friend, Robin (whose mother belongs to Zoey:), an attempt to contribute something of
significance (to her) toward our friendship? To put this into perspective, are the frustrations of drawing Zoey representative
of yet another significant (to me) dram of my complications at work and at home
and at play?
Could it be
that I am but a thinking-too-much meshuggener,
with just another of my crazy tales told to embellish and embigger what I really do with my sketchbook and pencil down at
the Market?
That by adding all these fanciful graphite details of drawing Zoey
somehow makes my portraiture much more important that what it really is? (Referring to portraiture rather than sketching
does this too, does it not?)
Or am I just the ever tormented narcissist attempting to
convince the reader that I’ve this prodigious talent for drawing faces, and I need to keep wanting the world (the readers of this blog and the walkers of the
market) to know this?
Could it be
that I am that wildcatter busker (pun intended), first sketching portraits of
people, now sketching portraits of pooches, lobbying for sketching cats next on the list? (Several people did ask if I could draw their
moggies should they bring pictures of their mousers to Market next Saturday!)
Or … is this
particular essay just another drawn-out pointless shaggy-dog tale (pun intended
on all sorts of levels), offering excitement for the writer (me) but boring for
the reader (you).
Hmmm … not
surprisingly, I did meet some very enjoyable people down at the Market. Here is my CHAUCERIAN PARADE of
humans ... NOT hounds:
RON |
KORY and KEVIN |
MADISON and BAILEY and RYLAND and JILL and MARIUS |
STU and PEGGY CRAM |
- RON said I made him look old ... he was being funny.
- KEVIN insisted he tell every passer-by my age ... he was being funny (a lovely couple).
- MADISON and BAILEY and RYLAND and JILL and MARIUS was my BIGGEST drawing ever. What a beautiful family!
- STU is my favorite photographer who has shot me many times over the years. This is the first time I'd met his wife, PEGGY.
Stu’s
accoutrement is his camera -- my accoutrement is a pencil.
Stu’s camera
shutters at the truth -- my pencil never lies!